In the United Methodist
portal in the US, the
commentary by Bishop Pennel poses an important question “Radical
Religion or radical love”. In essence, if we were to be radical or
extremist, it should be about showing radical love rather than being
closed minded and insisting on harmful actions on the basis of it
being sanctioned by God.
Bishop Pennel stated that
religion matters profoundly and effects social
order. He said that it was an instinct to love God that produces
Christianity amongst other religions. This is only partially true
because in Christianity, it is God who loved us first not that we love
God. Jesus, God incarnate came down from heaven to die for us, a
poignant fact carefully excluded by the Bishop.
Religion is indeed passing into
the secular arena in Europe, although in America, the Christian Right
with its block voting is shaping society albeit desperately for the case
of Gay marriage. Religion has indeed great power in many countries
especially in the Middle East and Africa. Yet the call to love and for
conversation between different "non extremist" elements of
religious faiths may win
some support in more progressive America, but in many places around the
world, such majority progressive faith seldom
exists.
The danger of a religious Faith
or extremism is not a closed mind or attitude.
Extremism is when we imposed our faith on others, and in particular
making it a state law. For example, in many
countries, it is very common for harsh penalties to be imposed
for changing one's faith.
The religious laws of the majority are also harsh
and merciless trageting the weak and outcasts. Gays
for example aren’t allowed to marry and in some cases put to death. The
antidote to such state religious extremism is not to emphasis on the
“love of God” but to insist of secularism where space is given to all.
Bishop Pennel highlighted a case
of religious extremism in Afghanistan where a religious cleric rejoiced
at the shooting down of the Seal helicopter
claiming it was an act of God. A sweeping conclusion was then made such
views were very isolated. However, the support for Taliban which is a
religious order is very strong in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In fact, a
poll by the Pew Research showed some interesting statistics that:-
-
49% in Nigeria of a
particular religious faith supports Al-Qaeda
-
60% in Jordan of a
particular religious faith supports Hamas
Hence, the Bishop’s
imagination that religion in general is non-extremist
hence open to the possibility of joining hands in the common desire to
show the love of God is not realistic. Lurking beneath the norms
of civil society is the "Lord of the Flies", our innate religious animalistic
nature. The core basis of the Bishop's entire argument is that the basis
and foundation of all religions are about love. Religion however can
have three foundations:-
a. Human Idea and creation.
b. Based on God almighty.
c. Based on other spiritual deities.
The Jews for example, not only worshiped God, but
fell into worshipping other gods/deities eg Baal and Ashteroth, the
religion of the Cananites, many forms of which later spread into Asia
minor and Europe. It was the Lord of Harvest, and a blood thirsty god
demanding human sacrifice. It was a spiritual entity where they have
anal sex with the priests to join themselves with the demonic spirit.
Therefore, secularism where all religions are
private and keep to their own religious mountain is the hope for
humanity and peace and not any grand argument based on mutual love and
kinship.
Bishop Pennel correctly alluded
to instances of Christian extremism with the example
of arsons, firebombing etc of abortion clinics. However, such
rare isolated cases could not be compared to state
based organized militant groups such as Iran who have killed thousands
in the name of religious faith or who hanged gays by their thousands
just for being gay. Religious extremism is not only an isolated
view but have wide support.
It could be argued conversely that progressive
Christianity is no better and our support for abortion is also an act of
violence. We are all extremist one way or the other even though we may
see ourselves as loving.
Bishop Pennel then
conclude that the “non
extremist” religious people of faith
which he implied is the majority should come together
to witness to a loving God. It is a fundamental call to love but
may not be a very effective call outside of the States.
Such call is rather idealistic and based on a
presumptous innate goodness and purity of the religious faith.
However, many of the religious dogmas of the major
faiths aren’t very loving. Many state based religious laws are cruel and
brutal especially against the GLBT community.
The foundation of major
religious faith may not be based on instinct to love God as postulated
by the United Methodist Bishop. For example,
the Mormons came about when its leader claimed to be the Messiah in but
in reality to avoid persecution for having too many wives. The Catholic
Church history is a rather dubious takeover by Rome of Christendom even
to the extent of claiming authenticity by linking the Roman Popes to
Peter! The supremacy of Rome meant the supremacy of the church.
Their determination to maintain power and control is through a very
harsh homophobic and sexist structure where gays are dammed.
A better call would be for religious faith to be a
matter of a personal and private observance as it once was rather than
insisting on outward adherance by others or by the state. It is a call
for a secular state not a godless state by any means but that all
religions should be in a closet and maximum space given to practise a
private faith.
The State should not favor nor prescribed to any
religion, nor should religious faith be given special rights eg tax
examptions which has been abused by the Christian Right and their mega
churches and TV businesses.
There is no room for example for people to use
Christianity (directly or implied) as reasons for banning gay marriage
or limiting basic rights for gays. Therefore, the talk of radical love
by radical religions can be insulting based on their track record
especially in some countries where the large majority of the
conservative Christian faith (eg in Uganda) has all but put gays in
closets and persecuted just for being gays.
Such valiant calls to put religious faith in
closets for the good of the majority may also be ineffective as religion
has such a strong and emotive call. For example, the very vast majority
of S'porean churches attended the Transformation 2009 conference which
at the core of it was part of the Dominion aggenda to go beyond the
religious mountain. Based on the narrow definition of Bishop Pennel, we
have 99% extremist in Singapore which makes his notion of the majority
being progresives rather doubtful and perhaps true only in the US.
The true call for Christian Faith is not only
about us loving God or even God's love for us, but to emphasis on God's
Grace, and mercy. Without showing grace nor mercy, our love is not of
Christ but carnal human love based on the religious law.
The Pharisees were religious and loved God but they
ended up killing the Messiah. Their cry, Shema Israel, loving God as
ourselves, was never enough. It must be personifed in God's grace and
mercy through Jesus Christ.
Our natural instinct is to love God through the
religious law, many of them are harmful and self righteous and take away
the basic rights of gay people even though they don't harm us.
Instead our attitude should be the appreciation of
God's love for us, and the measured in return of how we show grace and
mercy to others in our lives. Against such grace, there is no law nor
religion.
The measure of how a religious faith shows
God's love, mercy and grace is how it treats its gay community. Jesus
Christ was never against gays. He said that they were born as such from
birth, and He was concerned only on the hypocrisy of the religious, and
the rampant sexual adultery of the straight people.
True religion is measured not by our love for God,
but by humility that we are sinners needing God's love, grace and mercy,
and redemption in Christ Jesus. We should not be interested only in
radical love but also in radical grace and mercy where even the worst
sinner could be forgiven. This is the message of the Gospel.
|