Deu 22:5
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall
a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto
the Lord thy God.
The Singapore edition of Christian Post article
"Rescued from Gender Dysphoria by Scripture, Spirit" posted on 13 July
12 talks about the life of S'pore famous Leslie Lung of Liberty League
who has been part of the anti-gay league of reparative therapies
together with the likes of Choices of the infamous Anglican Church of
our Saviour.
The term cisgender is used to describe "individuals
who have a match between the gender they were assigned at birth, their
bodies, and their personal identity" which are most of us.
Trangenderism is very different from being gay, a
point often deliberately confused by the ex-gay Christian movement. In
Singapore, transexuals who had their sex change can have their IC
changed to reflect that they are legally a female.
Even the S'pore Government accept transexuals. Why
can't we?
The Christian Post presented the traditional
Christian arguments against transgenderism based on a Jewish culture.
It's important to give an alternative Christian conversation.
The cause of the transgenderism was quickly blamed
on the lack of parental support as the cause. It said "Leslie did not
have the benefit of parental guidance in male conduct ....".
The blame of not having adequate male parental
guidance as the cause of gender Dysphoria is a creation of some christians without
any scientific support or sound reasoning. The truth is that GLBT
peoples have very normal parents.
In terms of scripture, being a "Christian", the
verse Deut 22:5 of not wearing a woman's clothing being a man was used
as a reason not to deviate from one's gender identity that we were born
with.
Led by the Spirit?, the sex change surgery was
considered the point of no return, because it goes against the opposite
of what we have been born with.
However, the bible and in particularly the OT Jews
should be understood in the strong religious and cultural leanings of
Patriachy where the men had a higher status than women. Therefore, it
was a sin to lower one's status to that of a woman.
The patriachal leanings was inherited in the NT by
Paul who didn't think much of women preaching to men and was not
comfortable with women departing from having separate worship areas from
men dutifully covering themselves with a head scarf. Such inhibitions
still remain in many middle east culture till today not from a Christian
faith.
Yet, Deut 22:5 should be understood much more than
just a patriachal inhibition, for the term "abomination" used here as a
connotation of pagan religious worship by people of faith.
One of the religions that was dominant in ancient
times was the worship of the goddess Cybel, the goddess of fertility.
Her consort was a handsome young men who dies after castrating himself
and is resurrected annually. The worship was a celebration with drums,
flutes and cymbals celebrating the return. We are reminded that when
Moses went up in the mountain of God, he heard a loud commotion at the
Jewish base camp worshiping the idol. Indeed, the goddess Cybel had many
names and appearances in different cultures since the ancient of times:-
Babylon - Ishtar
Ashtoreth/Baal in Canaan
Greece, Rome - Cybele
Asia Minor - Aphrodite
The priests of Cybele were Eunuchs. The young men
who wanted to avail themselves to the goddess would castrate themselves
at the height of the celebration and dressed with women's clothing. The
worshippers would have anal sex with the priests to join themselves
spiritually to the goddess. They were men having anal sex with the
Eunuch priests but they were defintely not gay nor motivated by same sex
love. In Romans, when Paul talked about exchanging the natural for the
unnatural, he was talking about the pagan priests who had unnaturally
changed their sex to become a woman by castrating themselves.
Therefore when Jesus said in Mat 19:12 of those who
make themselves "Eunuchs" for Kingdom sake, all would have known that
these were priests of Cybele who has castrated themselves to worship the
goddess. Jesus clearly distinguished these counterfeit straight eunuchs
with eunuchs that are born as such from their mother's womb ie naturally
without an attraction to women. Some have tried to spin it as celibacy
but I don't see many catholic priests castrating themselves.
Hence, the arguments by the surface reading of
scripture and the spirit alone fails to reflect a deeper cultural and
religious meaning behind the blibical inhibition of people of faith not
worshipping the God of Israel but other gods. The main lesson here is
not about transgenderism but about not worshipping other spiritual
deities.
As Christians, our identity is in Christ ie we are
united in Jesus death and resurrection as God and Saviour as the the
way, the truth and the life.
We are accepted not because of gender, sexual
orientation, social/economic status but because of our faith in Jesus
Christ.
We are included in the radical love of God
demonstrated by His death for us so that we can have a choice to enter
into covenant relationship with Jesus by God's grace not that we
deserved it by any good works.
All are welcome into the communion table of Jesus
Christ.
The word to our transgender christian friends
today is that "Jesus loves you, this I know", just as you are.